#trumpswindle | #GOP
This is a bit worrisome:
I am not surprised by President Donald Trump’s antics this week. Not by the big splashy pronouncements such as announcing a wall that he would force Mexico to pay for, even as the Mexican foreign minister held talks with American officials in Washington. Not by the quiet, but no less dangerous bureaucratic orders, such as kicking the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff out of meetings of the Principals’ Committee, the senior foreign-policy decision-making group below the president, while inserting his chief ideologist, Steve Bannon, into them. Many conservative foreign-policy and national-security experts saw the dangers last spring and summer, which is why we signed letters denouncing not Trump’s policies but his temperament; not his program but his character.
We were right. And friends who urged us to tone it down, to make our peace with him, to stop saying as loudly as we could ‘this is abnormal,’ to accommodate him, to show loyalty to the Republican Party, to think that he and his advisers could be tamed, were wrong. In an epic week beginning with a dark and divisive inaugural speech, extraordinary attacks on a free press, a visit to the CIA that dishonored a monument to anonymous heroes who paid the ultimate price, and now an attempt to ban selected groups of Muslims (including interpreters who served with our forces in Iraq and those with green cards, though not those from countries with Trump hotels, or from really indispensable states like Saudi Arabia), he has lived down to expectations.
Precisely because the problem is one of temperament and character, it will not get better. It will get worse, as power intoxicates Trump and those around him. It will probably end in calamity—substantial domestic protest and violence, a breakdown of international economic relationships, the collapse of major alliances, or perhaps one or more new wars (even with China) on top of the ones we already have.
Eliot A. Cohen is a former Bush administration lawyer under Condoleezza Rice at the State Department. By no means should we disregard his analysis, but it is from the outset nearly stereotypical in its partisan and personal interest: Good for him, you know, because he is not surprised. And, hey, pat him and his friends on the back, because they were right: The problem is not President Trump’s policies, but his temperament, as his policies demonstrate. It is not his program, but his character, as his program makes clear.
It is hard to know what question goes here. Certes, the obvious comes to mind: Does that mean these problematic policies would be just fine if executed by a president of better temperament and character? Because the obvious counterpoint arises: Better temperament and character would ostensibly forestall these policies. Cohen’s arrangement seems well enough. But as he turns to his fellow conservatives, appealing to those who would work in a Trump administration, and those who would analyze and assess from afar, what, exactly, are they considering? That the president of better temperament and character could design and implement a better Muslim ban? Could more appropriately quash the scientific community?
Perhaps a better temperament and character could grab ’em by the pussy with a little more dignity, too.
What, exactly, is Mr. Cohen after, other than pissing on intraparty rivals?
Image note: Photo by Olivier Doulier/Pool/Getty Images
Cohen, Eliot A. “A Clarifying Moment in American History”. The Atlantic. 29 January 2017.