What It Comes To (Unbelievable)

#trumpswindle | #WhatItComesTo

“We recognize that disbarment has not been imposed in other frivolous litigation cases, but none of those cases involve the aggravating factors presented here .... No prior disciplinary cases involving frivolous litigation are remotely comparable to this case. We conclude that disbarment is the only sanction that will protect the public, the courts, and the integrity of the legal profession, and deter other lawyers from launching similarly baseless claims in the pursuit of such wide-ranging yet completely unjustified relief.”

―D.C. Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility

What is unbelievable about what it comes to is the fact, in and of itself, of what it comes to. A former U.S. Attorney and beloved celebrity known as “America’s Mayor” is to be disbarred in the District of Columbia for improper behavior in the course of trying to overturn an election. The unanimous Board, under Chair Bernadette C. Sargeant, observed that Giuliani “alleged that the elections boards in seven Pennsylvania counties were engaged in a deliberate scheme to change the outcome of the 2020 Presidential election in Pennsylvania by counting mail-in ballots that should not have been counted”, and “urged a federal judge to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvania voters even though he had no objectively reliable evidence that any such scheme existed, or even that any illegal mail-in ballots had been counted”. Under any circumstances, it ought to be difficult to challenge an election result; the standard should be high. But Rudy Giuliani, who has already faced disciplinary action in other jurisdictions, is among more than a dozen lawyers suffering particular consequences of their extraordinarily stupid schemes to overturn an election.

“A reasonable lawyer,” the Board explains, would have concluded that there was not a faint hope of success” about the conspiracy theory Giuliani brought before the Middle District of Pennsylvania; he “alleged a scheme to steal the Pennsylvania election without the slightest factual basis.” It is difficult to explain, but near the heart of certain conspiracy theories is a pretense of ignorance far too large to disbelieve; e.g., attorneys such as Christina Bobb or Marco Rubio somehow not knowing basic procedural language or circumstance. Part of what Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and others tried to promote required that the attorneys complaining about how the elections worked have no idea how elections work. Given the stakes, the appeal to ignorance really ought to be unbelievable. Like the Wednesday Putsch itself, we are to believe these are rebels without a clue.

____________________

Image note: Rudy Giuliani, an attorney for President Donald Trump, waves to people during White House Sports and Fitness Day on the South Lawn of the White House, in Washington, D.C., 29 May 2018. (Andrew Harnik/AP Photo)

Board on Professional Responsibility. In the Matter of: Rudolph W. Giuliani, Respondent. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. 31 May 2024.

The Donald Trump Show (Immigration and Cannibalism Edition)

#trumpswindle | #WhatTheyVotedFor

Donald Trump on immigration:

Silence of the Lamb! Has anyone ever seen The Silence of the Lambs? The late, great Hannibal Lecter is a wonderful man. He oftentimes would have a friend for dinner. Remember the last scene? “Excuse me, I’m about to have a friend for dinner,” as this poor doctor walked by. “I’m about to have a friend for dinner.” But Hannibal Lecter. Congratulations. The late, great Hannibal Lecter.

____________________

Image note: Donald Trump at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York City, 2024. Detail of photo by Win McNamee.

@Acyn. “Trump: Silence of the lamb! The late great Hannibal Lecter. It is a wonderful man.” X. 11 May 2024.

The Murmur and Buzz

Once upon a time, the question of what people were seeing on network news seemed an important reference point. It’s one thing to collect news nearly in realtime, as many do online, but even once upon a time when social media was not nearly so prominent in our lives, it seemed significant when a story made its way up from the murmer and buzz of alternate and specialized news into more mainstream sources like papers of record, evening news, and even the Sunday morning talk circuit. Toward which, George Stephanopoulos, on This Week:

Until now no American president had ever faced a criminal trial. No American president had ever faced a federal indictment for retaining and concealing classified documents. No American president had ever faced a federal indictment or a state indictment for trying to overturn an election or been named an unindicted co-conspirator in two other states for the same crime. No American president ever faced hundreds of millions of dollars in judgments for business fraud, defamation and sexual abuse. Until now, no American presidential race had been more defined by what’s happening in courtrooms than what’s happening on the campaign trail, until now.

The scale of the abnormality is so staggering that it can actually become numbing. It’s all too easy to fall into reflective habits, to treat this as a normal campaign where both sides embrace the rule of law, where both sides are dedicated to a debate based on facts and the peaceful transfer of power.

But that is not what’s happening this election year. Those bedrock tenets of our democracy are being tested in a way we haven’t seen since the Civil War. It’s a test for the candidates, for those of us in the media, and for all of us as citizens.

____________________

Image note: George Stephanopolous appears on This Week with George Stephanopoulos, ABC News, 28 April 2024.

Stephanopoulos, George. “‘This Week’ Transcript 4-28-24: Trump’s Legal Landscape, State of Play in Battleground Georgia, and White House Natl. Security Comms Adviser John Kirby”. This Week with George Stephanopoulos. 28 April 2024.

Probably the End of Nothing

#WhereIsCricket | #WhatTheyVotedFor

It’s one thing to say something like, the partisan, Ron Filipkowki, observes―

I’m still trying to figure out the angle of why the puppy homicide details were in the book. To show toughness? Promote the 2nd Amendment? Ruthlessness? Ability to make difficult decisions? I’m trying to figure out where a positive arguably outweighs the obvious negative.

―but the way things are, we ought lend that word, partisan, only so much value. The former prosecutor, and former Republican, might be an anti-Trump activist, but consider what has happened if this sort of basic political analysis is somehow especially subtle.

It’s the sort of drum we can bang over and over on a slow march along a downward road, but history makes clear that some proverbial they really do never learn. There is no rock bottom for this self-inflicted spiral.

It is hard to share the faith that the terrible story of South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem boasting about how she slew a puppy should kill a political career as dead as the dog. Or the goat. To the one, the last twenty years, at least, ought to make the point: There is no rock bottom. To the other, remember, these are Republicans. These are conservatives. It’s one thing if, as the saying goes, the cruelty is the point. But it is also important to consider what else people think Republican voters want to hear. Child labor? Birth control crackpottery? Children in labor? How long has it been since Milo said what, and still managed to stick around long enough to have a public Nazi scandal make him the poster boy for deplatforming¹, and things have only gotten worse. There is now a Nazi bloc in Congress, and the presumptive Republican nominee is an authoritarian with dictatorial ambitions, admirer of notorious strongmen, and has a long history of showing white supremacist and even neo-Nazi sympathies; meanwhile, his strongest GOP challenger wants to be a Nazi mom.

And toward all that, it is worth considering Charlotte Clymer’s suggestion that “Kristi Noem decided that she needed a way to set herself apart from other prospective Trump running mates by demonstrating to him that she can: 1) be ruthless and 2) ‘trigger the libs’ effortlessly.” Whether or not Noem miscalculated “that only liberals would be outraged, and she’d be able to laugh through it all” remains to be seen; while conservatives pretend outrage, the question will not be answered until it is time to either vote for her or not.

____________________

Image note: Cartoon by Matt Bors, 31 January 2017.

¹ A brief trend in alt-right and libertarian complaint almost immediately preceding “cancel culture”; despite the actual accuracy of the term, the complaint did not stick.

@cmclymer. “My theory: Kristi Noem decided that she needed a way to set herself apart from other prospective Trump running mates by demonstrating to him that she can: 1) be ruthless and 2) “trigger the libs” effortlessly.” X. 26 April 2024.

@RonFilipkowski. “I’m still trying to figure out the angle of why the puppy homicide details were in the book…”. X. 28 April 2024.

The Easy Joke

Okay, I confess, I don’t believe it: No true Maga would say, “At least Trump can put two sentences together.”

(Waiting on the narrator.)

____________________

Image note: Cartoon by Clay Bennett, Chattanooga Times Free Press, 28 April 2024.

Our American Circumstance: How It’s Going

“We lift our heads. Something has changed. Somewhere, at some time in the destruction, something awful happened. We stopped our forward move toward being humane, and are slipping quickly backward to the state of animals. The trains still run nearly on time, but we do not. What sustained our hearts and hopes is gone.”

― Jack Cady

____________________

Image note: Cartoon by Mike Luckovich, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 20 March 2024

Cady, Jack. The American Writer: Shaping a Nation’s Mind. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999.

Our American Circumstance

#trumpswindle | #AmericanPrestige

In the moment that a news host explains Donald Trump is acquitted but not vindicated, it seems that he is speaking not so much to his American audience, but, rather, appealing to the world. The idea that we’re not finished, that the Republic isn’t dead and buried, is only extraordinary for the fact of its proximity. Our American tale continues, but this most recent chapter is a particular tragedy of our disgrace.

The Incontinence of Evil (Amateur Hour)

The incontinence of Evil aside, it occurs to wonder if, amid the constant stream of accusation, the Church ever takes a moment to sit back, sigh indulgently, raise a glass to Satan, and murmur, “Fuckin’ amateurs.”

____________________

Image note: After anticommunist activist Marion Smith warned that, “Evil appears to be incontinent in 2020”, the Church of Satan denied responsibility for Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, explaining, “This is not a satanic ritual, nor does [it] have anything to do with Satanism.” Via Twitter, 19 October 2020.

What They Voted For (Foxconnsin Zen Martini Mix)

#trumpswindle | #WhatTheyVotedFor

Josh Dzieza offers the setup, for The Verge:

Hopes were high among the employees who joined Foxconn’s Wisconsin project in the summer of 2018. In June, President Donald Trump had broken ground on an LCD factory he called “the eighth wonder of the world.” The scale of the promise was indeed enormous: a $10 billion investment from the Taiwanese electronics giant, a 20 million-square-foot manufacturing complex, and, most importantly, 13,000 jobs.

Which is why new recruits arriving at the 1960s office building Foxconn had purchased in downtown Milwaukee were surprised to discover they had to provide their own office supplies. “One of the largest companies in the world, and you have to bring your own pencil,” an employee recalls wondering. Maybe Foxconn was just moving too fast to be bothered with such details, they thought, as they brought their laptops from home and scavenged pencils left behind by the building’s previous tenants. They listened to the cries of co-workers trapped in the elevators that often broke, noted the water that occasionally leaked from the ceiling, and wondered when the building would be transformed into the gleaming North American headquarters an executive had promised.

The renovations never arrived. Neither did the factory, the tech campus, nor the thousands of jobs. Interviews with 19 employees and dozens of others involved with the project, as well as thousands of pages of public documents, reveal a project that has defaulted on almost every promise. The building Foxconn calls an LCD factory—about 1/20th the size of the original plan—is little more than an empty shell. In September, Foxconn received a permit to change its intended use from manufacturing to storage.

Even the handful of jobs the company claims to have created are less than real: many of them held by people with nothing to do, hired so the company could reach the number required for it to get tax subsidy payments from Wisconsin. Foxconn failed at that objective, too: last week, Wisconsin rejected the company’s subsidy application and found it had employed only 281 people eligible under the contract at the end of 2019. Many have since been laid off.

The punch line, of course, is not funny, and more of a kick in the teeth. Some part of me wonders at a performance art scandal from once upon a time, and it ought not be so obscure a memory when Steve Jobs told President Obama certain jobs weren’t coming back°. The prospect of inevitability, that of course it’s Foxconn, should be absurd, but this is also the Trump administration, and of everything else under the sun during the game show host’s presidency, his petty obsession with somehow undoing his predecessor is neither an obscure observation nor the strangest possible explanation for the nearly ineffable mess in Wisconsin: “This is something I can’t talk about ever again,” one employee told Dzieza, “because people think you’re crazy, like none of this could ever happen. How could this happen in the US?”

The Pumpkin Post (Vanilla Mix)

First, you really don’t want to know.

Yeah, pumpkin spice is not the worst flavor but I hate being reminded of dogfucking and basic bitchery every time I buy a vanilla latte, or just anything in general.

(SlayerSlayer [qtd. in Futrelle])

Then again, if I could properly explain why this is funny, well, perhaps it isn’t a wasted effort. Okay, nevermind, but still.